Back this week we have Tom and Ed doing another video cigar review. This time the guys take on the Casa Magna Colorado while hanging out at Ed’s Shop, St Pete Pipe and Cigars.
9 thoughts on “Casa Magna Colorado (Guest Review)”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Related Posts

Smoke and Steel: Episode 002 – Finding the Perfect H. Upmann Domino Table
Welcome back to another episode of the Smoke and Steel podcast! I’m Walt, and in this episode, I want to share the story of how I finally landed the perfect domino table for our cigar sessions – an authentic H. Upmann brand table. The Search for the Perfect Cigar Lounge Domino Table Several years ago, […]

Smoke and Steel: Early Episode Access and Discord Community
Hey everyone, Walt here. I wanted to give you a quick update on what’s been happening with the Smoke and Steel podcast and share something I’m pretty excited about. So Tuesday night, the gang and I got together to record episode 4 – all six of us crammed around the mics, talking cigars and having […]

Adrian Magnus XO
Howdy do, fellow cigar enthusiasts! I’m back this week with something truly special that landed in my humidor – the Adrien Magnus XO cognac infused cigars. These premium Dominican sticks caught my attention not just for their luxury positioning, but for their unique Hennessy XO cognac infusion process. After smoking through three of these beauties, […]
Tom and Ed — I always watch your reviews! I like the interplay and the fact that we’re getting 2 opinions at once. And I like that one has a similar plate to me, and the other MUCH more experienced, lol. Keep up the great work!
As far as the CM, I’ve only had one (same size reviewed), and had a very similar experience to you. I liked it enough to pick up about 6 more of various sizes.
It was a very nice smoke, I liked how clean it was on the palate. Not real complex, but enough to keep me interested and I liked the flavors. I got hints of a sweet spice here and there that reminded me of the Tatuaje Verocu, my favorite cigar.
As far as Cigar Afficianado — eh. I don’t trust reviewers that only smoke an inch or so of the cigar, lol. I like your reviews much better. If they wanted to name this “Value Cigar of the Year,” I think no one would have complained. But there were plenty of new sticks last year that were better, imvho, such as the Tempus, Cabaiguan, El Triunfador, and probably more.
Great review Tom & Ed, although I don’t really like this smoke. Keep em comin!
Great review! I just thought the cigar was BLAH throughout. I never even got a head rush or anything and I am a mild-medium cigar lover. Now I only had 1 of them, so maybe I had a bum stick. No matter what, it should not be cigar of the year! There is no way.
Mike
Just love the outtakes 🙂
I always for some reason pass up this stick..maybe time to give one a shot..thx guys great review as always.
Love the review. Colorado is Spainish for the color Red. The wrapper has a red hue, hence the name.
Thanks for the comments everyone. Hope everyone enjoyed the review.
njstone – I’ve always said that Ed IS the man.Usually when my palate falls short, Ed can pick up the slack in a pinch. I just don’t see how this is the cigar of the year though.
Good review, but this cigar is average in my opinion and I have smoked four of them. the only size I somewhat liked was the shorter nublike fat robusto. This cigar makes me wonder how much money was thrown at Cigar Aficionado to make it the #1 cigar of the year.
Very nice review. I had only one of these from last year’s Big Smoke in Las Vegas. I let it rest in the humidor for seven month then gave it a shot. I thought it was fairly tasteless and I just could not understand the high rating for this cigar. I might try another if the price is right but with so many great cigars, I probably won’t take that opportunity.
Not my kind of cigar. Not much of a flavor profile. Compared to the La Flor Dominicana, it’s a dud.